A structured timeframe, usually two months, is commonly utilized throughout the Individualized Training Program (IEP) course of to facilitate particular actions. This era could be employed for actions similar to evaluations, assessments, or the implementation of agreed-upon interventions earlier than a proper IEP overview or assembly. For instance, a college staff may use this era to assemble knowledge on a college students response to a brand new assist technique.
These outlined durations play an important position in making certain well timed and acceptable assist for college kids with disabilities. They permit for constant monitoring of progress and supply a construction for educators, mother and father, and directors to collaborate successfully. Traditionally, timelines inside particular training procedures have been carried out to safeguard scholar rights and guarantee accountability within the supply of companies. Common check-ins promote responsiveness to scholar wants and stop delays in receiving vital instructional helps.
Understanding the aim and performance of such structured timelines is essential for fogeys, educators, and anybody concerned within the IEP course of. This data facilitates productive discussions and knowledgeable decision-making, in the end contributing to optimistic scholar outcomes. The next sections delve additional into particular features of IEP timelines and their sensible purposes.
1. Well timed Evaluations
Well timed evaluations are essential throughout the IEP course of, ceaselessly using structured durations like a two-month timeframe. These evaluations present a basis for knowledgeable decision-making concerning a scholar’s instructional wants and progress.
-
Figuring out Eligibility
Evaluations confirm whether or not a scholar qualifies for particular training companies. Inside a delegated timeframe, assessments are carried out to find out if a scholar has a incapacity and requires specialised instruction. This course of may contain cognitive testing, tutorial assessments, and observations. For instance, a scholar exhibiting problem in studying may bear a complete studying analysis to find out the presence of a particular studying incapacity.
-
Establishing Baseline Efficiency
Evaluations set up a scholar’s present degree of educational and purposeful efficiency. These baseline knowledge factors present a benchmark in opposition to which future progress is measured. For example, assessments can pinpoint a scholar’s studying degree, math expertise, or communication talents initially of the intervention interval. This preliminary evaluation is crucial for gauging the effectiveness of subsequent interventions carried out throughout the designated timeframe.
-
Figuring out Particular Wants
Well timed evaluations establish particular areas the place a scholar requires assist. This targeted strategy permits IEP groups to develop individualized objectives and targets tailor-made to deal with these wants. An analysis may reveal particular challenges in decoding phrases, impacting studying fluency. This particular data permits for focused interventions throughout the designated interval, addressing the foundation of the issue.
-
Informing IEP Improvement
The information gathered from evaluations immediately informs the event of the IEP. This consists of establishing acceptable objectives, figuring out the companies required, and deciding on acceptable lodging. Analysis findings present the proof base for IEP selections, making certain that the plan aligns with the scholars particular person studying wants throughout the allotted timeline. For instance, if an analysis reveals a processing velocity deficit, the IEP may embody lodging similar to prolonged time on exams.
These aspects of well timed evaluations work synergistically to make sure that the IEP is a dynamic and responsive doc. By offering crucial details about a scholar’s strengths, wants, and progress, evaluations contribute considerably to the effectiveness of the IEP course of and the achievement of optimistic scholar outcomes inside structured timeframes.
2. Structured Interventions
Structured interventions are inextricably linked to outlined timelines throughout the IEP course of, similar to a 60-day calendar. This structured timeframe supplies the required framework for implementing, monitoring, and evaluating the effectiveness of interventions designed to deal with a scholar’s particular studying wants. The outlined interval creates a cycle of plan-do-study-act, enabling educators to systematically implement focused assist and assess its affect. For instance, if a scholar displays problem with math problem-solving, a structured intervention may contain specific instruction in problem-solving methods, coupled with alternatives for guided and unbiased observe throughout the 60-day interval. This structured strategy ensures constant supply of the intervention and facilitates knowledge assortment for progress monitoring.
The connection between structured interventions and outlined timelines is crucial for a number of causes. First, it promotes accountability by setting clear expectations for implementation and progress monitoring. Second, it facilitates data-driven decision-making. By amassing knowledge on scholar efficiency all through the designated timeframe, educators can decide the effectiveness of the intervention and make vital changes. This may contain modifying the intervention, rising its depth, or exploring different methods. For example, if a scholar demonstrates minimal progress after a 30-day interval, the IEP staff can analyze the info and alter the intervention accordingly, maximizing the potential for enchancment throughout the remaining timeframe. Third, it ensures well timed and acceptable assist for college kids. The structured timeline helps forestall delays in receiving vital interventions, selling well timed entry to specialised instruction and assist companies.
Efficient implementation of structured interventions inside designated timeframes requires cautious planning, constant monitoring, and ongoing communication amongst IEP staff members. Challenges could come up, similar to surprising absences or difficulties in amassing dependable knowledge. Nonetheless, by adhering to the established timeline and sustaining open communication, the IEP staff can proactively handle these challenges and be sure that the coed receives acceptable and well timed assist. This structured strategy, mixed with ongoing analysis and adjustment, maximizes the probability of optimistic scholar outcomes throughout the outlined interval and contributes to the general success of the IEP.
3. Progress Monitoring
Progress monitoring is intrinsically linked to structured timelines throughout the IEP course of, similar to a 60-day calendar. This timeframe supplies the framework for systematically amassing knowledge on scholar efficiency and utilizing that knowledge to tell instruction and intervention. Common progress monitoring ensures that interventions stay aligned with scholar wants and permits for well timed changes to maximise effectiveness.
-
Information Assortment Strategies
Varied knowledge assortment strategies are employed throughout the designated timeframe to watch scholar progress. These may embody curriculum-based measures, formative assessments, observations, and work samples. The chosen strategies rely on the particular objectives and targets outlined within the IEP. For example, if a objective focuses on enhancing studying fluency, knowledge may be collected by way of timed studying passages. If the objective addresses social expertise improvement, observations and anecdotal information may be used.
-
Frequency of Monitoring
The frequency of progress monitoring is set primarily based on the coed’s particular person wants and the character of the interventions. Some college students could require every day or weekly monitoring, whereas others could profit from bi-weekly or month-to-month checks. The 60-day calendar facilitates constant knowledge assortment on the acceptable intervals. Frequent monitoring permits for early identification of areas the place a scholar is making progress or experiencing challenges.
-
Information Evaluation and Interpretation
Collected knowledge is analyzed to find out the effectiveness of the interventions and the coed’s total progress towards IEP objectives. Information evaluation may contain calculating charges of enchancment, evaluating efficiency to baseline knowledge, or inspecting tendencies in efficiency over time. This evaluation supplies helpful insights that inform tutorial selections and changes to the IEP. For instance, if knowledge reveals {that a} scholar will not be making sufficient progress towards a studying objective, the IEP staff can use this data to regulate the intervention or discover different methods.
-
Communication and Collaboration
Common communication amongst IEP staff members, together with mother and father, lecturers, and associated service suppliers, is crucial for efficient progress monitoring. Sharing knowledge and discussing scholar progress facilitates collaborative decision-making and ensures that everybody is knowledgeable concerning the scholar’s improvement. The 60-day timeframe usually culminates in a gathering the place progress is reviewed, and changes to the IEP are mentioned. This collaborative strategy ensures that the IEP stays a dynamic doc conscious of the coed’s evolving wants.
These aspects of progress monitoring work in live performance throughout the framework of the 60-day calendar. By offering a scientific strategy to knowledge assortment, evaluation, and communication, progress monitoring ensures that the IEP is a dynamic and responsive doc that successfully helps scholar studying and development. This cyclical strategy of monitoring, analyzing, and adjusting in the end contributes to optimistic scholar outcomes and the profitable implementation of the IEP.
4. Collaboration Framework
A collaborative framework is crucial for the profitable implementation of timelines throughout the IEP course of, similar to a 60-day calendar. This framework facilitates communication, shared decision-making, and coordinated efforts amongst all stakeholders, together with mother and father, educators, associated service suppliers, and directors. Efficient collaboration ensures that the IEP stays a dynamic and responsive doc that addresses the coed’s evolving wants throughout the designated timeframe. This collaborative strategy is essential for fostering a shared understanding of the coed’s strengths, wants, and progress, in the end contributing to optimistic scholar outcomes.
-
Shared Understanding and Aim Setting
The collaborative framework fosters a shared understanding of the coed’s current ranges of efficiency, studying wants, and IEP objectives. Common communication and conferences throughout the 60-day timeframe be sure that all stakeholders are knowledgeable and aligned. For instance, mother and father may share insights into the coed’s studying kinds and preferences, whereas lecturers contribute observations from the classroom. This shared understanding informs the event of acceptable and measurable objectives throughout the designated interval.
-
Coordinated Intervention and Assist
A collaborative framework facilitates coordinated implementation of interventions and assist companies. Common communication throughout the 60-day timeframe ensures constant implementation throughout all settings. For example, a speech-language pathologist may collaborate with the classroom trainer to combine language assist methods into every day instruction. This coordinated strategy maximizes the effectiveness of interventions throughout the designated interval.
-
Constant Progress Monitoring and Information Sharing
Collaboration ensures constant progress monitoring and knowledge sharing amongst stakeholders. Common conferences and communication channels throughout the 60-day calendar present alternatives to debate scholar progress, analyze knowledge, and make knowledgeable selections. This shared understanding of the coed’s progress permits for well timed changes to interventions and ensures that the IEP stays conscious of the coed’s wants throughout the designated timeframe. For instance, if knowledge reveals {that a} scholar will not be making sufficient progress, the staff can collaboratively alter the intervention or discover different methods.
-
Joint Determination-Making and Downside-Fixing
The collaborative framework promotes joint decision-making and problem-solving. Throughout the 60-day calendar, the IEP staff meets recurrently to debate scholar progress, handle challenges, and make changes to the IEP. This collaborative strategy ensures that selections are made within the scholar’s greatest curiosity and that every one views are thought of. For instance, if a scholar experiences problem with a specific lodging, the staff can work collectively to establish different options throughout the designated timeframe.
These aspects of a collaborative framework are important for the efficient implementation of timelines throughout the IEP course of. By selling shared understanding, coordinated efforts, constant communication, and joint decision-making, this framework ensures that the IEP stays a dynamic and responsive doc that maximizes scholar success throughout the designated timeframe. The collaborative strategy strengthens your entire IEP course of, fostering a way of shared duty and contributing to optimistic scholar outcomes.
5. Accountability Measure
Accountability measures are integral to structured timelines throughout the IEP course of, similar to a 60-day calendar. This timeframe serves as a concrete mechanism for making certain that agreed-upon actions and interventions are carried out successfully and that scholar progress is monitored systematically. The outlined interval creates a cycle of accountability, selling well timed motion and data-driven decision-making. For example, if an IEP staff determines {that a} scholar requires a particular assistive know-how, the 60-day calendar supplies a timeframe for buying and implementing the know-how, with progress monitoring knowledge demonstrating its affect on scholar studying. With out such a timeframe, implementation may be delayed, hindering the coed’s entry to vital helps. This accountability mechanism ensures that selections made throughout the IEP course of translate into tangible actions inside an outlined interval.
The significance of accountability inside this construction is multifaceted. It ensures that college students obtain the helps and companies outlined of their IEPs in a well timed method. The 60-day calendar serves as a benchmark for measuring progress and figuring out potential roadblocks. For instance, if an intervention will not be carried out as deliberate, the structured timeframe permits for well timed identification and corrective motion. This accountability additionally promotes collaboration amongst IEP staff members by establishing shared expectations and obligations. Moreover, it supplies a framework for data-driven decision-making, enabling the IEP staff to regulate interventions primarily based on scholar progress throughout the designated timeframe. This data-informed strategy enhances the responsiveness of the IEP to particular person scholar wants. Take into account a scholar scuffling with writing; knowledge collected throughout the 60-day interval may reveal that the initially chosen technique is ineffective, prompting the staff to discover different strategies throughout the remaining timeframe. This iterative course of, pushed by knowledge and accountability, maximizes the potential for optimistic scholar outcomes.
In abstract, the 60-day calendar serves as a crucial accountability measure throughout the IEP course of. It ensures well timed implementation of interventions, facilitates progress monitoring, promotes collaboration, and allows data-driven decision-making. Whereas challenges similar to unexpected circumstances or useful resource limitations can come up, the structured timeframe supplies a mechanism for addressing these challenges proactively and making certain that the IEP stays a dynamic and efficient software for supporting scholar studying. This deal with accountability in the end advantages college students by selling well timed entry to vital helps and maximizing the potential for optimistic instructional outcomes.
6. Responsive Changes
Responsive changes are inextricably linked to the 60-day IEP calendar. This timeframe supplies the construction for implementing interventions, monitoring scholar progress, and making vital changes primarily based on knowledge. The 60-day calendar ensures that the IEP stays a dynamic doc, conscious of the coed’s evolving wants. With out such a structured timeframe, changes may be delayed, hindering scholar progress. Take into account a scholar who receives a brand new assistive know-how as a part of their IEP. Throughout the 60-day interval, knowledge may reveal that the chosen know-how will not be successfully supporting the coed’s studying. The structured timeframe prompts the IEP staff to re-evaluate the know-how and discover different choices or changes throughout the remaining timeframe, making certain the coed receives acceptable assist with out undue delay. This responsiveness is essential for maximizing the effectiveness of the IEP.
The 60-day calendar facilitates responsive changes in a number of methods. First, it establishes a transparent timeframe for knowledge assortment and evaluation. Common progress monitoring inside this era supplies the required knowledge to tell changes. Second, the structured timeframe promotes proactive intervention. Reasonably than ready till the annual IEP overview, changes could be made throughout the 60-day interval, making certain well timed assist for the coed. This proactive strategy prevents delays in addressing scholar wants and maximizes alternatives for studying. Third, the timeframe fosters collaboration amongst IEP staff members. Common conferences and communication throughout the 60-day interval allow the staff to debate scholar progress, analyze knowledge collaboratively, and make knowledgeable selections about changes. This collaborative strategy ensures that changes are aligned with the coed’s particular person wants and the general objectives of the IEP.
In conclusion, the 60-day IEP calendar is crucial for facilitating responsive changes. It supplies the construction for knowledge assortment, promotes proactive intervention, and fosters collaboration amongst IEP staff members. This responsive strategy ensures that the IEP stays a dynamic and efficient software for supporting scholar studying and development. Whereas challenges, similar to entry to sources or surprising modifications in scholar wants, can come up, the structured timeframe supplies a mechanism for addressing these challenges proactively and making certain that the IEP stays aligned with the coed’s greatest pursuits. This deal with responsiveness in the end contributes to improved scholar outcomes and the general success of the IEP course of.
7. Authorized Compliance
Authorized compliance is a crucial facet of using structured timelines, similar to a 60-day calendar, throughout the Individualized Training Program (IEP) course of. Federal legal guidelines, particularly the People with Disabilities Training Act (IDEA), mandate timelines for varied IEP procedures. These timelines serve to guard scholar rights and be sure that college students with disabilities obtain a free acceptable public training (FAPE) in a well timed method. The 60-day calendar, whereas not explicitly mandated in all conditions by IDEA, could be a sensible software for adhering to legally required timelines for evaluations, IEP improvement, and implementation of companies. For example, IDEA units timelines for finishing evaluations and conducting IEP conferences. A 60-day calendar could be strategically employed to make sure these authorized deadlines are met, stopping procedural violations and making certain compliance. Failure to stick to those authorized timelines may end up in noncompliance, probably resulting in due course of hearings or different authorized actions.
Understanding the intersection of authorized compliance and structured timelines is essential for all stakeholders concerned within the IEP course of. Adhering to established timelines ensures that college students obtain well timed evaluations, acceptable interventions, and entry to vital companies. This adherence safeguards scholar rights and promotes accountability throughout the particular training system. Moreover, it minimizes the chance of authorized disputes and fosters a collaborative surroundings targeted on scholar wants. For instance, if a father or mother requests an preliminary analysis for his or her youngster, the college should adhere to the legally mandated timeline for finishing the analysis. Using a 60-day calendar will help the college handle the analysis course of effectively and meet the authorized requirement, avoiding potential disputes and making certain the coed receives well timed evaluation. This proactive strategy demonstrates a dedication to each authorized compliance and scholar well-being.
In abstract, authorized compliance and the usage of structured timelines throughout the IEP course of are interconnected. Timelines, such because the 60-day calendar, present a sensible framework for assembly legally mandated timelines for varied IEP procedures. This adherence safeguards scholar rights, promotes accountability, and minimizes the chance of authorized disputes. A deep understanding of those authorized necessities is crucial for all stakeholders to make sure that the IEP course of is carried out in a legally sound and student-centered method, in the end contributing to optimistic scholar outcomes and a compliant particular training system. Challenges could come up in assembly these timelines on account of elements similar to restricted sources or unexpected circumstances. Nonetheless, proactive planning, efficient communication, and a dedication to authorized compliance can mitigate these challenges and be sure that the IEP course of serves its meant objective of offering a free acceptable public training for college kids with disabilities.
8. Information-Pushed Choices
Information-driven selections are intrinsically linked to the structured timeframe of a 60-day IEP calendar. This timeframe supplies the required construction for amassing, analyzing, and decoding knowledge on scholar progress, enabling knowledgeable selections concerning instruction, interventions, and IEP changes. The cyclical nature of the 60-day calendarimplement interventions, monitor progress, analyze knowledge, alter interventionsestablishes a suggestions loop the place knowledge immediately informs decision-making. This data-driven strategy ensures that the IEP stays a dynamic doc, conscious of the coed’s evolving wants. For instance, if a scholar’s studying fluency knowledge reveals restricted progress throughout the first 30 days of a brand new intervention, the IEP staff can use this knowledge to regulate the intervention, discover different methods, or modify tutorial approaches throughout the remaining timeframe. With out this data-informed strategy, selections may be primarily based on assumptions or anecdotal observations, probably delaying efficient assist for the coed.
The sensible significance of data-driven selections throughout the 60-day IEP calendar is substantial. It promotes accountability by requiring goal proof of scholar progress or lack thereof. This accountability ensures that interventions are evaluated primarily based on their effectiveness, not simply their meant objective. Moreover, it fosters collaboration amongst IEP staff members by offering a typical language and framework for discussing scholar progress and making knowledgeable selections. Information evaluation supplies a impartial floor for dialogue, facilitating goal conversations about scholar wants and the effectiveness of interventions. For example, if knowledge persistently demonstrates {that a} scholar advantages from a particular lodging, similar to prolonged time on exams, this knowledge supplies compelling proof for persevering with the lodging. Conversely, if knowledge reveals that an lodging will not be yielding the specified outcomes, the staff can collaboratively discover different helps primarily based on the accessible proof. This data-driven strategy promotes knowledgeable decision-making and ensures that the IEP is tailor-made to the coed’s particular person wants.
In abstract, data-driven selections are important for maximizing the effectiveness of the 60-day IEP calendar. This data-informed strategy ensures that interventions and helps are aligned with scholar wants, promotes accountability, and fosters collaboration amongst IEP staff members. Challenges could come up in amassing dependable knowledge or decoding knowledge precisely. Nonetheless, skilled improvement on knowledge evaluation strategies and ongoing communication amongst stakeholders can mitigate these challenges. By prioritizing data-driven selections throughout the structured timeframe of the 60-day IEP calendar, educators and IEP groups can be sure that the IEP stays a dynamic and responsive doc that successfully helps scholar studying and development.
Ceaselessly Requested Questions
This part addresses widespread inquiries concerning structured timelines throughout the IEP course of, particularly specializing in the sensible software and implications of using designated timeframes for implementing and monitoring interventions.
Query 1: What’s the major objective of using a structured timeframe, similar to 60 days, throughout the IEP course of?
Structured timeframes present a framework for implementing interventions, monitoring scholar progress, and making data-driven selections. They guarantee well timed motion and promote accountability within the supply of particular training companies.
Query 2: Is a 60-day timeframe a authorized requirement below IDEA for all IEP processes?
Whereas IDEA mandates particular timelines for sure procedures, similar to evaluations and IEP conferences, a 60-day timeframe will not be universally mandated. Nonetheless, it may be a helpful software for managing the IEP course of and making certain adherence to authorized necessities.
Query 3: How does a structured timeframe contribute to data-driven decision-making throughout the IEP course of?
A structured timeframe supplies a scientific strategy to knowledge assortment and evaluation. Common progress monitoring throughout the designated interval allows IEP groups to judge the effectiveness of interventions and make knowledgeable changes primarily based on goal knowledge.
Query 4: What position does collaboration play inside a structured IEP timeframe?
Collaboration is crucial for efficient implementation of structured timelines. Common communication and conferences throughout the designated timeframe be sure that all stakeholders are knowledgeable, concerned in decision-making, and dealing collaboratively towards shared objectives.
Query 5: How can challenges, similar to restricted sources or surprising scholar absences, be addressed inside a structured timeframe?
Proactive planning, open communication, and suppleness are key to addressing challenges inside a structured timeframe. The IEP staff ought to have contingency plans in place and be ready to regulate timelines or interventions as wanted whereas sustaining a deal with scholar wants and authorized compliance.
Query 6: How does a structured timeframe profit college students with disabilities?
Structured timeframes guarantee well timed entry to interventions and helps, promote accountability within the supply of companies, and facilitate data-driven decision-making. This deal with well timed and acceptable assist maximizes the potential for optimistic scholar outcomes.
Understanding the aim and software of structured timelines is prime to efficient IEP implementation. These timelines present a framework for motion, promote accountability, and facilitate data-driven decision-making, in the end contributing to optimistic outcomes for college kids with disabilities.
For additional data and sources concerning IEPs and particular training legislation, seek the advice of your state’s division of training or search steerage from particular training advocacy organizations.
Sensible Ideas for Using Structured Timeframes within the IEP Course of
The next ideas present sensible steerage for successfully using structured timeframes, similar to a 60-day calendar, throughout the Individualized Training Program (IEP) course of. These methods promote environment friendly implementation of interventions, constant progress monitoring, and collaborative decision-making.
Tip 1: Set up Clear Objectives and Aims: Clearly outlined objectives and targets present the inspiration for structured interventions and progress monitoring. Guarantee objectives are measurable and aligned with scholar wants.
Tip 2: Develop a Detailed Implementation Plan: A complete implementation plan outlines particular actions, timelines, and obligations for every IEP staff member. This detailed plan ensures coordinated and constant implementation of interventions throughout the designated timeframe.
Tip 3: Choose Applicable Information Assortment Strategies: Select knowledge assortment strategies aligned with scholar wants and IEP objectives. Take into account quite a lot of strategies, similar to curriculum-based measures, formative assessments, and observations, to assemble complete knowledge.
Tip 4: Set up a Constant Monitoring Schedule: Common progress monitoring is crucial for data-driven decision-making. Set up a constant schedule for knowledge assortment and evaluation throughout the designated timeframe. The frequency of monitoring ought to be decided by particular person scholar wants.
Tip 5: Facilitate Ongoing Communication and Collaboration: Open communication and collaboration amongst IEP staff members, together with mother and father, are essential. Common conferences and communication channels be sure that everyone seems to be knowledgeable about scholar progress and concerned in decision-making.
Tip 6: Make the most of Information to Inform Changes: Information evaluation ought to inform changes to interventions, helps, and IEP objectives. The structured timeframe supplies a mechanism for making well timed and data-driven changes to maximise scholar progress.
Tip 7: Doc All Actions and Choices: Keep thorough documentation of all interventions, progress monitoring knowledge, and selections made throughout the designated timeframe. This documentation supplies a helpful document of the IEP course of and helps accountability.
By implementing the following tips, educators and IEP groups can leverage structured timeframes to make sure that the IEP course of is environment friendly, data-driven, and conscious of particular person scholar wants, in the end contributing to improved scholar outcomes.
The next part concludes this complete overview of structured timelines throughout the IEP course of and affords closing suggestions for maximizing their effectiveness.
Conclusion
Structured timelines throughout the IEP course of, usually exemplified by a 60-day calendar, present an important framework for supporting college students with disabilities. This structured strategy ensures well timed evaluations, facilitates focused interventions, promotes constant progress monitoring, and fosters data-driven decision-making. The emphasis on collaboration inside these outlined durations ensures that every one stakeholdersparents, educators, and associated service providerswork collectively to realize shared objectives. Accountability is paramount inside this framework, making certain that selections translate into actions and that college students obtain the required helps and companies outlined of their IEPs. Moreover, adherence to authorized timelines and a dedication to responsive changes assure that the IEP stays a dynamic and efficient software for assembly particular person scholar wants.
Efficient implementation of structured timelines requires cautious planning, ongoing communication, and a dedication to data-driven decision-making. Whereas challenges could come up, a proactive and collaborative strategy can mitigate these difficulties. The last word objective stays to offer college students with disabilities a free acceptable public training that empowers them to succeed in their full potential. Continuous refinement of practices surrounding IEP implementation and adherence to established timelines are important for fostering a responsive and efficient particular training system. This dedication advantages not solely particular person college students but additionally strengthens the tutorial system as a complete, selling inclusive practices and making certain that every one college students have the chance to succeed.
